Difference between a Physical Server and a Virtual Server Print

  • 6

When selecting any server, such characteristics as processor frequency, amount of RAM and disk space are important. But ease of use, reliability and cost play an equally important role.



Physical server: When ordering physical equipment, it is necessary to correctly calculate the requirements for the server. If you want to upgrade your hardware, you can additionally order RAM or add hard drives. If the project has grown significantly, then you can migrate to a more powerful server or take an additional one.

Virtual Server: Virtualization is popular because of its easy and convenient scalability. Increasing the capacity pool is extremely simple and quick, but we must take into account that the maximum value is limited by the tariff plan. This category of servers is suitable for medium-sized projects that do not require large computing power



Physical server: The server is located in the data center and is used for its administration, settings, reboots, etc. Remote access to equipment via IPMI is required. The equipment is the responsibility of its lessee. You can also contact the support service by first drawing up a detailed technical specification. The advantages of physical servers are that they have higher parameters in the category of number of cores, RAM, and disk space. You have the opportunity to build RAID arrays. You can also collect information regarding the state of the server without restrictions and use all available resources without loss for virtualization.

Virtual server: allows you to install a limited set of operating systems and change system parameters.


What's better?

Considering the above facts, the choice clearly leans towards a physical server, since it is possible to implement complex and large-scale projects on it

Was this answer helpful?

« Back